The light of reason shines over the winter snow in a Derbyshire village  
 

Welcome to Derbyshire Secularists and Humanists

Who are we?

We are atheists and agnostics who make sense of the world using reason, experience and shared human values.

We take responsibility for our actions and base our ethics on the goals of human welfare, happiness and fulfillment.

We seek to make the best of the one life we have by creating meaning and purpose for ourselves, individually and together.

We answer the big questions for life without need of a god and we reject ideas for which there is no need and no evidence.

We are happy to provide a free speaker on any topic, anywhere, at any time - contact us for details.

Free guide

We have produced a free 12 page guide to humanism.

To obtain a copy please send us an email with your name and address.

New religious schools

New Islamic schools will open in Derby in September 2012 with a planned intake of over 750 pupils.

Please click here for details.

From a girl in Year 6 in a Derbyshire primary school when the class was asked to define "religion":

"It's all Chinese whispers - one person makes up something and tells someone else, They add more stuff and pass it on. In the end everyone believes it."

Eat your heart out philosophers!

Click to visit the web site for No Need For God

"No Need For God"

Please click here to find out about our new book: "No Need For God".

The book is based on the author's experience of giving talks on atheist humanism to thousands of school students over the last five years.

The book is designed for those aged between 10 and 15 but it is an excellent introduction to atheist humanism for anyone of any age.

The front cover was selected by students in year 10 at Derby Moor school and the text was discussed with students at Bristol, Derby, Durham, Leeds and Oxford universities.

To quote one student at Oxford:

"I wish we had had this when we were doing RE at school because it's hard to get atheist ideas across in class without some written backup."


What do we do?

We have helped to change the RE syllabus for all Derby City and Derby County schools - that's over 500 schools! The syllabus now includes the study of "non-theist world views" (Atheist Humanism) at all key stages.

Each year we go into many primary and secondary schools to give lessons and talks about our views. Last year we spoke to over 2,000 pupils.

Each year we provide speakers for all sorts of organisations all over the country on many different topics.

We wish we did more. We wish we held regular meetings. However, to do more we would need people willing to organise things. At the moment we have people very active in education - but we need someone to take the initiative to broaden what we do. Contact us if you are willing to help.

Learning "about" religion

We differentiate between "religions" (as structures and institutions) and people who believe. We don't object to people having beliefs, as long as those beliefs cause no harm to anyone and they do not call for anything bad: discrimination, intolerance, prejudice, oppression, etc.

We oppose religious ("faith") schools and we oppose worship in schools.

We support the idea of children being taught about religions - after all, we don't want them to grab the first religion they come across and we certainly don't want them to become uninformed bigots.

However, we have a problem when people tell us that there is something we can learn from religions. As we see it, what we learn from religions is only negative - and has been the cause of violent confrontation for millennia.


Thoughts for the day

  • Everyone was an atheist until someone invented the god idea.
  • Truth is not subject to a vote. If 50 million people believe a foolish thing it is still a foolish thing. The god idea is a foolish thing.
  • Occam's razor: the simplest answer is the best - the one that makes the fewest assumptions and invents the fewest new ideas. The god idea fails totally.
  • There is no need for the god idea and no evidence for it - there are much simpler answers to the big questions of life.
  • Some people have a personal need for the god idea, others don't. Why?
  • If god is so powerful why are there over 1,000 named gods and over 200 named religions/sects in the world today?
  • A strong, internalised sense of personal morality is far better than one contained in a book written by nomadic goat herders over 2,000 years ago.
  • Does god have a gender? Would it solve a lot of problems if religious people called their god "she" rather than "he"?
  • Most people are apatheists - they don't care one way or the other about the god idea because it has no impact on their day-to-day lives.
Click for more information

Supporting freedom of religion & belief

We support the right of everyone to have freedom of thought, religion, belief and expression - as long as none of them cause, or call for, any form of physical, psychological or economic harm to anyone.

We support the right of religious people to practice their religion (preferably quietly) - as long as they fund such activities out of their own pockets.

 

We support the right of religions to stand on their own two feet - independent and free of any form of public subsidy.

For that reason we do not support religious ("faith") schools.

At the moment all taxpayers (believers and non-believers) are forced, by threat of imprisonment, to pay for 100% of the costs of religious schools. This is not simply fair on those of us who have no need of gods or religions.


National organisations

We support the National Secular Society (NSS) and the British Humanist Association (BHA).

        

The NSS produces NewsLine, a free weekly newsletter - on-line or sent by email

The BHA organises a humanist celebrant service for namings, marriages and funerals.

On the subject of funerals, you might like to look at our page on death and funerals.


Profiles of religious belief

Religious groups are not homogeneous - there is as much variation within a religious group as there is within a non-religious group.

No individual, or group (sect), within a religion can speak on behalf of the whole religion. Someone in the middle ground may say "Our religion does not support violence, our religion is not homophobic, our religion treats girls and women as equals" where someone else will say the opposite - and be proud of it.

Obviously they share the same religion, the same prophets and the same holy books - but the range of views can be extremely wide.

Liberal Judaists are "liberal", Ultra Orthodox Judaists have views to the right of Attila the Hun.

So, whenever listening to a "religious spokesperson" or "self-appointed religious leader" - take it all with a big pinch of salt!

Please click here to visit our page illustrating various profiles for religious belief.


Morality and respect

Morality has nothing to do with religion - there are good and bad religious people just as there are good and bad non-religious people.

Humanism does not lay down a set of rules cast in stone or prescribed in holy books. However, we have a strong sense of personal morality because we believe that with rights and freedoms go personal responsibilities.

One of our supporters defines her own "moral code" as:

  • Cause no direct or indirect harm to anyone by what you do or say.
  • Pursue freedom, fairness and justice for all.
  • Treat other people in the same way you would like them to treat you.
  • Take care of the world around you to leave a positive legacy for the future.

She then goes on to define "harm" as "physical harm, emotional harm, economic harm, discrimination, prejudice or oppression."

We respect those who earn respect by what they do, not by what they say or what they believe.

We have infinite respect for people like those who work selflessly for organisations such as Médecins Sans Frontières - people who put their principles and humanity into action.

We have no respect of abstract ideas - even our own. All ideas are open to criticism and sometimes ridicule - it is not possible to offend an idea.

The problem comes when religious people feel that ideas should be respected merely because they are written in a holy book and millions of people believe them. Perhaps they should lighten up and accept that criticism of ideas is not the same as criticism of a person.

The Catholic church

We have no respect for the Catholic church nor for a Pope who claims that "In the 1970s, paedophilia was seen as a natural thing for men and children."

He obviously lives in a different world from the rest of us because this may have been true within the priesthood of the Catholic church but it has never been true for the rest of us!

We cannot respect a man who sheltered priestly abusers, who is directly responsible for the death of over 67,000 women each year from back-street abortions in countries where the Catholic church insists that abortion is illegal (WHO figures) and who has caused the death of millions from HIV/AIDS because of the church's ban on contraception.

It's not just Catholics

We can turn to any religion and find many example where immoral actions are justified in the name of religion. Currently the most obvious example is the violence and murder carried out by those who believe in martyrdom and an afterlife in Islam. For a less obvious example try Googling for the Goddess Yellamma and investigate the role of the Devadasi in Hinduism.


Click to enlarge

Morality is far too important to be left to religions!


How do slugs meditate?

We are frequently accused of picking on the Abrahamic religions (Judaism, Islam and Christianity.)

Well, we don't have a down on any particular religion - though we certainly disapprove of many of the things done in their name and we do have a habit of asking very simple questions which sometimes upset religious people.

Just for balance we have often wondered about the topic of karma in Buddhism. The Buddha (Siddhattha Gotama) had some excellent ideas during his lifetime - though his struggle to reach the conclusion that the best way to behave is to cause no harm to anyone or anything seems to indicate that he was a slow learner compared to we atheist humanists.

His opposition to the hierarchical structure of the Hindu religion at the time, and the role that the cast system played in maintaining the social status quo, is as relevant today as it was almost 2,500 years ago - and it certainly doesn't apply just to Hinduism. We have no doubt that he would turn in his grave if he could see how his ideas had been distorted into a religion complete with all the associated mumbo-jumbo. He explicitly stated that he was not to be worshipped by anyone - yet tens of thousands of temples and statues that have been built in his name.

Back to Karma.

It would seem that as a result of one's actions one accumulates both positive and negative karma during life as a human and, to a large extent this determines the form in which you will be reincarnated. We assume that those with lots of positive karma will return as humans so that they can once again pursue the path towards nirvana and a state where reincarnation is no longer necessary.

There is always the possibility, given the right amount of negative karma, that reincarnation could result in an individual returning as a slug. Our naive questions are

  • How does a slug achieve sufficient positive karma to return as a human in the next life?
  • How does a slug meditate and strive towards nirvana?

It would seem that a reasonably high level of consciousness, particularly self-consciousness, is required in order to pursue nirvana and to accumulate positive karma. How does the slug handle these things - by being kind to other slugs?

Are we being flippant? No. We are simply pointing out that the simplest and most child-like questions are the ones that tie religions in knots - even a non-deist religion like Buddhism.

Learning "from" religion


Religions have taught us a lot about tolerance - and we are strong on irony.

The importance of words

Religious words are full of value-laden assumptions - we need to make it crystal clear what they really mean.

Our use of key words:

  • Not "god" but "a god", "your god", "their god" etc. There are over 1000 different gods to choose from.
  • Not "he" when referring to a god but "she". If challenged, ask "does your god have a penis?"

    The religious claim that "he" is neutral - a neutrality that has led to the oppression of women by male-dominated religions. Time to redress the balance.

  • Not "religion" but "a religion", "your religion", "their religion" etc. There are over 200 different religions and sects in the world today.
  • Not "faith" but "need". A god and a religion meet the personal psychological and social needs of some people.
  • Not "faith school" but "segregated religious schools" - as in "the new apartheid of segregated religious schools".
  • Not "atheist", "agnostic" or "non-believer" but "god-free" - this expresses a positive thing - freedom from the mental shackles of religion.
  • Not "atheism" because there is no such thing - there is no set of beliefs associated with being an atheist.
 
DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript    www.SecularDerby.org - web site design by Derbyshire Secularists and Humanists.    DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript